Asus GT-AXE16000 vs TP-Hyperlink AXE300: A Good Struggle | Dudes Tech

In case you’re in search of an final Wi-Fi 6E router, this Asus GT-AXE16000 vs TP-Hyperlink AXE300 will provide help to out.

Since late 2022, these two have been one of the best standalone Quad-bad Wi-Fi machines representing the 2 standard community suppliers.

Contemplating that Wi-Fi 7 is true across the nook, they’re prone to stay the cream of the crop by their Wi-Fi 6E requirements. And meaning they’re going to keep related for years to come back.

That being stated, selecting one out of this pair may be difficult. This publish will push you in the correct path, however the detailed overview of every router will present extra info. Give them a very good learn.

Asus GT-AXE16000 vs TP-Hyperlink AXE300: two (nearly) equally glorious routers

The Asus GT-AXE1600 and the TP-Hyperlink AXE300 have rather a lot in widespread.

Each are huge Wi-Fi 6E routers with eight non-removable exterior antennas. Each have three Multi-Gig ports, excessive processing energy, and top-tier Wi-Fi specs. And each include a sturdy internet person interface and a helpful non-compulsory cell app.

With that, let’s take a look at its {hardware} specs.

Asus GT-AXE16000 vs TP-Hyperlink AXE300: {Hardware} Specs

Asus GT-AXE16000 vs TP-Hyperlink AXE300: The variations

Regardless of the same {hardware} specs, the 2 have main variations.

Initially, TP-Hyperlink Archer AXE300 uniquely includes a 10Gbps Multi-Gig/SFP+ combo LAN/WA port: it may well work in any approach and primarily based on WAN or LAN. This makes it extra versatile by way of gadget compatibility.

For instance, you need to use it with an SFP+ Fiber-topic ONT or host an SFP+ NAS server. On this case, the Asus GT-AXE16000 would require a converter, which isn’t a good suggestion.

Alternatively, the Asus proved to be a way more versatile router than:

• helps aggregation on each the WAN aspect and the LAN aspect.
• It options Twin-WAN with extraordinarily versatile community port configurations.
• it has all of the operational capabilities accessible to a router (entry level, repeater, media bridge, and so forth.).

On prime of that, whereas each are mesh-ready, Asus’ AiMesh is much superior to TP-Hyperlink’s OneMesh.

In consequence, the GT-AXE16000 could be a sturdy member of the Multi-Gigabit mesh. Against this, the Archer AXE300 can solely drive some low-end extenders, and for now, there isn’t any chance of wired mesh backhauling.

Lastly, the Asus USB ports can deal with far more community storage and different USB-based purposes than the TP-Hyperlink counterpart. That is all the time a very good factor for these seeking to get essentially the most out of their buy.

Asus GT-AXE16000 vs TP-Hyperlink AXE300: Total Rating and Efficiency

Asus GT-AXE1600 vs TP-Hyperlink AXE300: which one to purchase

In case you’re in search of a standalone router for a demanding residence, both one will likely be a superb selection. Every offers you true multi-gigabit wired efficiency and one of the best Wi-Fi efficiency on all accessible bands.

Of the 2, the TP-Hyperlink AXE300 is the one one which has built-in assist for SFP+. In case you want this port, it is the good selection – you will not must resort to a swap.

Nonetheless, if you wish to prolong Wi-Fi protection later and have many of the options, together with these associated to video games, with out paying extra, or if you wish to get one of the best USB-based purposes, the Asus GT-AXE16000 is the one to decide on.

Whether or not the Asus extras are well worth the greater worth is as much as you. Different Wi-Fi answer pairings can be found right here.